Tag Archive:
Committee of Seventy

The Geography of Democracy: Azavea Brings the Power of GIS to the Elections Arena

"Our mission is grand: Put the power of GIS and mapping into the hands of voters, grassroots campaign workers, and watchdog organizations. "

Map displaying ‘likely’ and ‘super’ voters by division.

Here at Azavea we’ve been talking about CNN’s Magic Wall, a tour de force in election information visualization. With nerdy glee, correspondent John King brings to viewers the spatial drama of the presidential race, sweeping his hands across the Magic Wall (an oversized monitor powered by dozens of live data feeds) to highlight swing states, break down demographic data, and tabulate possible combinations of electoral votes.

For the past few years, we’ve been hard at work developing our own election tools and services, albeit on a smaller scale and with a focus on state and local elections. But our mission is grand: put the power of GIS and mapping into the hands of voters, grassroots campaign workers, and watchdog organizations.


Map displaying dispersment of campaign contribution sources to a state legislator.

Cicero , Azavea’s legislative district boundary and elected official web API, is a field guide to the geography of democracy. Cicero connects citizens to their local, state, and national representatives by tapping into a massive database of voting district maps and information about politicians, legislative bodies, and election events. The Cicero database has launched dozens of projects designed to help voters understand our current political landscape, including a study of gerrymandering in the United States, an analysis of in-district vs. out-of-district campaign donations, an election day lookup tool that provides users with constantly updated vote tallys, and Comcast’s Your Local Politics website.

To help grassroots campaigns hit the ground running, we’ve developed tools to quickly generate hundreds of canvassing maps that pinpoint likely voters and supervoters in each precinct. We’ve used our DecisionTree web-based geographic planning and prioritization tool to build a prototype Elections and Advocacy application to enable campaigns to prioritize canvassing and get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts based on a selection of over 30 weighted electoral indicators including voting history, demographic data, and civic participation.


Map of election-day incidents that occurred in Philadelphia during the April 2008 primaries.

This November, we will continue to work with the Committee of Seventy, one of the oldest non-partisan political watchdog groups in the U.S., tracking election-day incidents – everything from voter intimidation to faulty equipment – at polling places throughout Philadelphia County. We launched this project last year during the mayoral race using PDF maps that were updated throughout the day. This year we built a real-time interactive web application that displays maps of election incidents as they are reported on screens at Committee of Seventy headquarters – our own version of a magic wall, if you will.

Online Real-Time Election Incident Mapping: When, Where, What, How … Instantaneously

"They hoped that a web-based mapping application would enable closer to real-time analysis and enable volunteers to access incident information from the field."

Committee of Seventy’s Election Oversight Program. This April, Pennsylvania’s unusually hotly-contested presidential primary provided a backdrop for a new and improved incident mapping project – this time moved from the desktop to the web.

With the expectation of higher-than-usual voter turnout and a large number of newly registered voters, Committee of Seventy and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law anticipated a busy day in their hotline command center. While the desktop-created maps Azavea prepared in November were very helpful, they had limited utility on the ground, as incidents were unfolding. They hoped that a web-based mapping application would enable closer to real-time analysis and enable volunteers to access incident information from the field.

With funding from the William Penn Foundation, the Committee of Seventy and Azavea were able to design and build a proof-of-concept application to address some of the basic needs of the Election Oversight Program. Using a mix of open source software tools including Google Maps, Open Layers, GeoServer and PostGIS (read the article on PostGIS below), we built an application that enabled rapid data entry as incident information was received and easy search by incident types. Without time to build the full functionality we’d eventually like to see in this application, we continued to use the ArcView-based system to create aggregated maps showing the number of incidents in each ward, State House, and State Senate District.

April 22nd was a busy day for volunteers and Azavea staff at the command center, with well over 400 incidents reported (more than three times the calls fielded during last November’s general election). Interspersed among calls to inquire about polling place locations were numerous complaints of missing registrations and registrations mysteriously showing a new party affiliation, people unable to vote because someone else had already voted in their name, and a few voters who felt intimidated by poll workers or campaign volunteers. With the website projected on the command center wall, each new incident added a little color and another interesting bit of information illustrating Philadelphia’s primary election.

Election Day Incident Mapping with Committee of Seventy: From the Innocuous to the Bizarre …

"... these reports and their accompanying maps help to paint a picture of just what occurs on Election Day, and exactly what issues and geographic locations need the most attention from voting officials."

Imagine. You are about to vote, someone approaches you and gives you a piece of their mind about whom they think you should vote for. Or, even more sordid…. some thugs walk up to you and “encourage” you to depart your polling station. Believe it or not, incidents like these do happen. That is why for several decades, Committee of Seventy, a Philadelphia-based, non-partisan elections watchdog group has focused on monitoring Election Day activities in Philadelphia to ensure that all citizens are able to exercise their right to vote.

On Election Day, Committee of Seventy works with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law to coordinate the Election Oversight Program, whereby election irregularities are monitored and registered through the combined efforts of volunteers and staff at a command center in parallel with teams of lawyers and volunteers deployed throughout the city. In the command center, team leaders field calls from voters, polling officials, as well as volunteers reporting election irregularities, then immediately coordinate with their teams at these locations to respond accordingly. During Philadelphia’s 2007 general election on November 6, Committee of Seventy turned to Azavea to help geographically record, map, and geo-analyze these incidents.



Maps showing concentration of election day incidents by ward.

The primary challenge of incorporating GIS into this endeavor was to create a system that would enable both quick recording of incidents and rapid map generation throughout the day. The catch was that a variety of maps was needed, including not just point maps showing individual incidents, but also aggregations by larger political boundaries indicating both relative numbers of incidents and proportions of different types of incidents.

Using ArcView 9.2, and taking advantage of ModelBuilder technology, Azavea volunteered to create a series of models that automatically performed the aggregations, some requiring as many as 35 tasks. These models were designed to take the incident point data and create choropleth maps at the ward, council district, and division levels with each map showing the aggregated number of incidents in each area, color-coded by types of incidents.

The incident maps proved helpful in several aspects of the Election Oversight Program. Committee of Seventy was able to identify problem trends citywide, ward-wide or district-wide and quickly respond to them. The information was compiled and continously analyzed so that they could stay on top of what was going on throughout Election Day.
With few hotly contested races in this election, Committee of Seventy wasn’t expecting a large number of incidents, but despite the relatively low turnout of an off-year election, 139 incidents were reported. Incidents ranged from the expected and relatively innocuous, such as voters unsure of where their polling places were, to troubling and bizarre, such as questionable behaviors by polling officials, rumors of thugs hired to intimidate voters and, the strangest of all: a local committeeman sitting in a van passing out alcohol and suspected by some to have a gun.

Though the mere report of an incident is no guarantee that it actually happened, or that it happened in quite the way described by the caller, these reports and their accompanying maps help to paint a picture of just what occurs on Election Day, and exactly what issues and geographic locations need the most attention from voting officials.

Jonathan David, Committee of Seventy’s Election Program Coordinator, noted that the maps were particularly important to “management staff and senior-level volunteers who needed to understand problematic trends – as they developed – so teams could respond quickly.” This trial run has been a success, leading Committee of Seventy and Azavea to use this experience to plan a more automated, web-based application that they hope to deploy for the 2008 presidential primaries and elections.

To read Committee of Seventy’s post election reports (including the election incident maps Azavea created) visit http://www.seventy.org/hot-topics/-2007-election-information/november-2007-post-election-report/.